Tuesday, May 25, 2010

We were right to nuke Japan


The Texas Board of Education's new social studies curriculum befits a state whose popular governor recently threatened secession from the United States.

But as much of a travesty as it is, as much of a virtual salute to the Confederacy that it is...the Left has done as badly, and, I suspect with less public outcry.

Today the Tucson Unified School District offers a Mexican American Studies curriculum based on a South American Marxist's "anticolonial" pedagogy that bluntly and unapologetically anti-American, teaching that the Southwest is really part of Mexico.

It's hardly alone. Across the Southwest, you can find this sort of thing wherever Mexicans have managed to establish a major presence in American communities--through a combination of illegal and legal immigration, previous amnesties and a high birthrate. Yet American leftists vigorously support it because they've adopted an ideology that's condemns America as simplistically as right wingers deify it.

A prime example is our nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WWII. Leftist historical revisionists have adopted Emperor Hirohito's stance in which he based his surrender on American barbarity--as shown by our using nukes against the Japanese.

This reveals the appalling ignorance of historical reality by leftists in America and abroad.

By August 1945 America was economically and spiritually exhausted. The war effort had cost many, many thousands of American lives, and the invasion of Okinawa revealed such ferocity on the part of the Japanese--soldiers and civilians--that we realized a million American lives could be lost in an invasion of Japan. And we didn't have the resources to mount a decades-long total blockade, the only viable alternative. Plus American public opinion at the time absolutely demanded unequivocal victory. If Truman hadn't done it the voters would have replaced him with someone who would.

PBS recently aired a somber, realistic documentary titled "Victory in the Pacific" that detailed what the situation really was like then. It totally refutes leftist revisionism--so remember this fact the next time someone mentions PBS's leftist tilt. Sometimes it does tilt that way, but more often as not it's as fair-minded as this documentary.

In the documentary a guy who'd been a marine in the Okinawa invasion recounted how he once saw an old Japanese woman come out of one of the many caves Japanese had been hiding in. She was responding to American soldiers calling into the cave, telling them to surrender. The Americans didn't know that the Japanese government had told civilians that if anyone surrendered for any reason, their family would be shamed forever, and that the Americans would murder the men immediately, then rape all the women before running them over with tanks.

This woman must have believed that, because, the soldier said, she pulled an American grenade out of her kimono, pulled the pin and threw it at the nearest American soldier. It exploded, killing the soldier. And the guy recounting his eyewitness account of this incident said "Then I shot her."

If you had polled the American soldiers like this Marine who were poised to invade the Japanese mainland later that month, and asked them whether they approved nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 99% of them would have said "Go for it." Ditto their families and friends back home. And they would have supported nuking every other Japanese city, one after another, if the Japanese failed to surrender, rather than invade or blockade.

Before we nuked Hiroshima the Japanese government had decided to reject our calls to surrender--in fact, they thought we were bluffing, and that a spirited defense against invasion would force us to give up and allow the Japanese military to remain in charge.

What's astonishing is that after we bombed Hiroshima, the head of the Japanese military told the government that we only had one of these bombs--and they decided that the only way they'd surrender would be if we left Japan's military government intact and didn't occupy the homeland.

And even after we nuked Nagasaki, they still almost didn't surrender. Junior officers, hearing of the Emperor's surrender document, stormed government buildings in an attempt to mount a coup d'etat and destroy the document. They might well have succeeded if Inami, the head of the military, had supported them.

After the surrender, Hirohito said that the Japanese military had relied too much on "spirit" and not enough on science.

My favorite comment came from the Empress, however. She wrote about seeing waves of B-29s flying over Tokyo during those last days before surrender, and noted that "unfortunately, the B-29 is a splendid airplane."

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Nuking them saved the face of the Emperor - how to fight such a weapon?

But equally important was that the soviets declared war and were mounting an invasion that would at least divide the country. This invasion would take place even before the US one.

Ehkzu said...

I'm sure the prospect of the Soviet invasion figured in the Emperor's decision to surrender. We might have had to nuke more cities to get their attention otherwise. The Japanese leadership portrayed the Americans as ogres in their domestic propaganda, but they knew how radically different life under the American boot heel would be vs. under the Soviet boot heel.

However, Truman couldn't wait to see what the Soviets would do, and if that would get the Japanese to surrender without us having to sacrifice more of our own blood and treasure. We were at the end of our rope--exhausted as a nation. Germany and Italy had surrendered. We just couldn't sustain our war effort much longer.

The thing missing from the Japanese memorial ceremony at Hiroshima that just took place was the Japanese government apologizing to the people of Hiroshima for the bombing. Oddly enough, though, they didn't. The Japanese aren't very good at accepting responsibility for their own behavior--and its consequences.