This editorial seems to assume that Republican voters share Democratic voters' values. And they do, to some extent, but in a different order.
Democrats are most terrified of being thought insensitive.
Republicans are most terrified of being thought weak.
The debating points the editorial cites shows how far apart the parties are. To the NYT it's self-evident that these points are wrong.
But take "Ending multilingual ballots (disenfranchising millions)." ---i.e. being insensitive. Quelle domage.
But a Republican reading it would say "First, that's Democrats being disenfranchised, second they're not--they're just being asked to learn this country's language so they understand the national discussion about the issues before they vote. Otherwise they'll vote tribally, for whatever group they belong to, instead of voting as Americans"
Ditto the NYT's horror of "making [illegal aliens'] lives miserable" in order to get them to self-deport. Again, that assumes that Republican voters fear being seen as insensitive to illegal aliens' feelings.
Seriously? Republicans could care less. it also hurts bank robbers' feelings to arrest them. And wife-beaters. So? Republicans would say it probably is "insensitive" for our nation to only accept people who we want to come here, instead of telling the world "step right up. Mi casa es su casa."
As if happens I'll be voting for Obama because of the GOP's voodoo economics. Not because it's "sensitive" to do so.